露天矿最终帮坡角及采深协同优化研究

金属矿山 ›› 2019, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (05): 37-42.

露天矿最终帮坡角及采深协同优化研究

郭赟林1，刘艳章^1,2，黄诗冰^1,2，胡斌^1,2，李凯兵¹，李伟¹

1. 武汉科技大学资源与环境工程学院，湖北武汉 430081；2.冶金矿产资源高效利用与造块湖北省重点实验室，湖北武汉 430081

出版日期:2019-05-15 发布日期:2019-07-03
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（编号：51074115，51574183，41702291）。

Study on Synergistic Optimization of Final Slope Angle and Mining Depth in Open-pit Mine

Guo Yunlin¹，Liu Yanzhang^1,2，Huang Shibing^1,2，Hu Bin^1,2，Li Kaibing¹，Li Wei¹

1. College of Resource and Environmental Engineering， Wuhan University of Science and Technology，Wuhan 430081，China；2. Hubei Key Laboratory for Efficient Utilization and Agglomeration of Metallurgic Mineral Resources，Wuhan 430081，China

Online:2019-05-15 Published:2019-07-03

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 最终帮坡角和采深是露天矿境界设计中2个相互影响的关键参数，其取值与露天矿的安全经济性密切相关。为探讨上述2个参数的合理取值，以西藏某露天铜矿12#典型勘探线剖面为研究对象，按经验类比法初步确定该剖面西、东边帮的最终帮坡角取值范围为38°~44°，选取不同的两帮坡角度值组合，根据境界剥采比小于经济合理剥采比的原则，计算得到底部标高取值范围为+ 4 135~ + 4 108 m。构建了该剖面的露天境界最终边帮有限元数值模型，采用强度折减法计算得到西、东帮的稳定安全系数，根据实际工程设计需要的边帮安全系数以及开采的经济性，得到该剖面合理的最终帮坡角与采深。研究表明：露天边帮稳定性随着最终帮坡角和采深的增加逐渐降低，且最终帮坡角的变化对本侧边帮稳定性的影响远大于对侧边帮，两参数之间互相影响，共同决定露天矿的安全经济性；计算得到该剖面合理的西、东帮最终帮坡角分别为42°、43°，底部标高为+ 4 117 m，总采深为920 m。所采用的露天矿最终帮坡角及采深的协同优化思路可为露天矿山科学确定相关参数提供参考。

关键词: 露天开采, 边帮安全系数, 最终帮坡角, 开采深度, 经济合理剥采比, 数值模拟

Abstract: The final slope angle and mining depth are two key parameters that affect each other in the design of open-pit boundary，and their values are closely related to the safety and economy of open-pit mine.In order to discuss the reasonable values of the above two parameters，taking the 12# typical exploration line section of an open-pit copper mine in Tibet as the study example，based on empirical analogy method，the final slope angles of the western and eastern slopes of the section are preliminarily determined as 38°~44°，and the combination of different slope angles are selected.According to principal of the boundary stripping ratio less than economic stripping ratio，the calculated bottom elevation is from + 4 135 m to + 4 108 m.The finite element numerical model of the final slope of the open-pit boundary of the section is established.The safety factors of the western and eastern slopes are calculated by strength reduction method.According to the safety factors of the slope and the economy of mining，the reasonable final slope angle and mining depth of the section are obtained.The study results show that the stability of open-pit slope decreases gradually with the increase of final slope angle and mining depth，and the influence of final slope angle on the stability of slope is much greater than that of the opposite side slope，the two parameters influence each other and determine the safety and economic effect of open-pit mine together；the calculated reasonable final slope angles of the western and eastern slopes of the section are 42° and 43° respectively， with the bottom elevation is + 4 117 m and the total mining depth is 920 m.The above study ideal of synergistic optimization of final Slope angle and mining depth in open-pit mine can provide some reliable reference for the scientific determination of relevant parameters in open-pit mines.

Key words: Open-pit mining, Safety factor of slope, Final slope angle, Mining depth, Economic stripping ratio, Numerical simulation

郭赟林, 刘艳章, 黄诗冰, 胡斌, 李凯兵, 李伟. 露天矿最终帮坡角及采深协同优化研究[J]. 金属矿山, 2019, 48(05): 37-42.

GUO Bin-Lin, LIU Yan-Zhang, HUANG Shi-Bing, HU Bin, LI Kai-Bing, LI Wei. Study on Synergistic Optimization of Final Slope Angle and Mining Depth in Open-pit Mine[J]. Metal Mine, 2019, 48(05): 37-42.

[1]	康志强, 辛东夫, 邵陆航, 张晨. L型充填管道料浆输送压力损失及优化研究[J]. 金属矿山, 2020, 49(09): 33-40.
[2]	蒋复量, 郭锦涛, 杨文超, 张超, 张洪浩, 马熠坤. 某地下矿山顶板诱导崩落最佳爆破延时时间取值研究[J]. 金属矿山, 2020, 49(09): 80-86.
[3]	肖益盖, 刘允秋, 汪为平, 王雨波, 夏才初, 徐晨, 吕志涛, 林梓梁. 某大型地下硐室群稳定性分析及加固技术研究[J]. 金属矿山, 2020, 49(09): 96-103.
[4]	吴大伟, 李元辉, 钱源, 范纯超, 董二虎. 深部破碎岩体巷道围岩控制技术研究[J]. 金属矿山, 2020, 49(08): 1-7.
[5]	于世波, 杨小聪, 王志修, 原野. 深部高应力矿柱应力隔断帷幕的卸荷效应研究[J]. 金属矿山, 2020, 49(08): 8-12.
[6]	罗浪, 李小双, 王运敏. 露天转地下开采不同坡高影响下覆岩采动响应特征研究[J]. 金属矿山, 2020, 49(08): 32-37.
[7]	张悦刊, 葛江波, 刘培坤, 杨兴华, 魏庆施. 对称双进口旋流器流场特征及分离性能[J]. 金属矿山, 2020, 49(08): 151-157.
[8]	吴振坤, 金爱兵, 陈帅军 . 胶结充填体动力试验及其爆破响应模拟研究[J]. 金属矿山, 2020, 49(07): 25-32.
[9]	谢亮波, 李二宝, 张西良, 杨海涛, 仪海豹. 侧向荷载下组合孔爆破参数优化取值试验研究[J]. 金属矿山, 2020, 49(07): 33-39.
[10]	赵兴东, 李怀宾, 张姝婧, 杨晓明, 张天航. 青龙沟金矿露天转地下采场稳定性分析及控制[J]. 金属矿山, 2020, 49(04): 10-14.
[11]	邱胜光. 降雨入渗对非饱和土体边坡稳定性影响及治理对策[J]. 金属矿山, 2019, 48(11): 62-67.
[12]	曾祥龙, 罗静. 铜山口铜矿水力旋流器数值优化试验研究[J]. 金属矿山, 2019, 48(11): 155-160.
[13]	王学涛, 崔宝玉, 魏德洲, 宋振国, 孟令国. 浓密机内部流场数值模拟研究进展[J]. 金属矿山, 2019, 48(11): 161-168.
[14]	聂兴信, 甘泉, 娄一博, 高建, 冯珊珊. 基于协同开采理念的急倾斜薄矿脉群集群连续化回采工艺研究[J]. 金属矿山, 2019, 48(09): 28-33.
[15]	胡绍豪, 郭广礼, 宫亚强. 基于完整钻孔柱状数值模拟的岩层移动角求取[J]. 金属矿山, 2019, 48(08): 54-57.