欢迎访问《金属矿山》杂志官方网站,今天是 分享到:

金属矿山 ›› 2019, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (05): 132-136.

• 地质与测量 • 上一篇    下一篇

利用卡尔曼滤波综合算法构建开采沉陷预测模型

陈竹安1,2,3,熊鑫1,危小建1,2,3   

  1. 1. 东华理工大学测绘工程学院,江西 南昌330013;2. 流域生态与地理环境监测国家测绘地理信息局重点实验室,江西 南昌330013;3. 江西省数字国土重点实验室,江西 南昌 330013
  • 出版日期:2019-05-15 发布日期:2019-07-03
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(编号:51708098),江西省教育厅课题(编号:GJJ160537),江西省自然科学基金项目(编号:20171BAA218018),东华理工大学江西省数字国土重点实验室开放研究基金项目(编号:DLLJ201814)。

Prediction Model of Mining Subsidence Based on Kalman Filter Integrated Algorithm

Chen Zhu'an1,2,3,Xiong Xin1,Wei Xiaojian1,2,3   

  1. 1. Faculty of Geomatics,East China University of Technology,Nanchang 330013,China;2. Key Laboratory of Watershed Ecology and Geographical Environment Monitoring,NASG,Nanchang 330013,China;3. Jiangxi Province Key Laboratory of Digital Land,Nanchang 330013,China
  • Online:2019-05-15 Published:2019-07-03

摘要: 为提高矿区地表沉陷预测精度,提出了基于自回归综合移动平均模型(Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average,ARIMA)的卡尔曼滤波模型与Elman神经网络相结合的综合预测模型。首先,针对沉陷监测序列的非平稳性与复杂性特点,ARIMA模型能够将原始数列平稳化,构建地表下沉预测模型,并作为卡尔曼滤波的状态方程;然后将Elman神经网络的沉陷预测结果作为观测值引入卡尔曼滤波观测方程中,建立综合预测模型;最后针对噪声方差Q与R选取的问题,统计出ARIMA模型与Elman神经网络模型的误差特性,从而计算出噪声Q与R的取值。分别将综合预测模型与BP神经网络模型、Elman神经网络模型以及卡尔曼滤波模型进行了预测精度对比,4种模型预测值与实测值的均方根误差分别为2.06、5.857 8、2.926 9、3.688 9 mm,相对误差分别为1.170 4%、3.050 2%、1.432 6%、1.908 4%,绝对误差平均值分别为1.886 7、10.703 9、2.329 4、2.807 6 mm。研究表明:综合预测模型能够有效减小单一预测机制造成的同一性质误差累积,其预测精度明显优于其余3种模型,对于大幅提升矿区地表沉陷的预测精度有一定的参考价值。

关键词: 开采沉陷, 卡尔曼滤波, 自回归综合移动平均模型, Elman神经网络, 综合预测模型, BP神经网络

Abstract: In order to improve the prediction accuracy of mining subsidence in mining area,a integrated prediction model with the combination of the Kalman filter model and Elman neural network is proposed based on the autoregressive integrated moving average model (ARIMA).Firstly,in view of the non-stationarity and complexity characteristics of the subsidence mining monitoring sequence,ARIMA model is able to stabilize the original sequence,so as to construct the prediction model of surface subsidence and serve as the equation of state of Kalman filter;then,the results of Elman neural network subsidence prediction is introduced as the measured value into the Kalman filter measurement equation to establish the integrated prediction model;finally,for the selection of noise variance Q and R,the error characteristics of ARIMA model and Elman network model are calculated,so as to calculate the value of noise Q and R.Comparison of the prediction accuracy of the integrated prediction model proposed in this paper and BP neural network model,Elman neural network model,Kalman filter model.The results show that the root-mean-square-error (RMSE)of the prediction values and actual measured data of the four models are 2.06,5.857 8,2.926 9,3.688 9 mm respectively,the relative error of the four models are 1.170 4%、3.050 2%、1.432 6% and 1.908 4%,mean absolute errors of them are 1.886 7,10.703 9,2.329 4,2.807 6 mm.The study results indicated that the integrated prediction model can effectively reduce the accumulation of errors of the same nature caused by a single prediction mechanism,the prediction accuracy of the integrated model is superior to the ones of other three models,it is help for improving the prediction accuracy of mining subsidence in mining area.

Key words: Mining subsidence, Kalman filter, Autoregressive integrated moving average model, Elman neural network, Integrated prediction model, BP neural network