欢迎访问《金属矿山》杂志官方网站,今天是 分享到:
×

扫码分享

金属矿山 ›› 2025, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (11): 266-272.

• 安全与环保 • 上一篇    下一篇

提高软土地层取土质量的试验研究

董教社1 杨 鹏1 徐文波1 甘建军2 韩 晓1   

  1. 1.上海市城市建设设计研究总院(集团)有限公司,上海 200125;2.江西水利电力大学水利工程学院,江西 南昌 330099
  • 出版日期:2025-11-15 发布日期:2025-12-02
  • 通讯作者: 杨 鹏(1996—),男,助理工程师,硕士。
  • 作者简介:董教社(1969—),男,教授级高级工程师。
  • 基金资助:
    上海市城市建设设计研究总院(集团)有限公司自主研发项目(编号:科CK2022018A);国家自然科学基金项目(编号:42162025)。

Experimental Study on Improving the Quality of Soil Sampling in Soft Soils

 DONG Jiaoshe1 YANG Peng1 XU Wenbo1 GAN Jianjun2 HAN Xiao1   

  1. 1.Shanghai Urban Construction Design & Research Institute (Group) Co.,Ltd.,Shanghai 200125,China; 2.College of Water Conservancy,Jiangxi University of Water Resources and Electric Power,Nanchang 330099,China
  • Online:2025-11-15 Published:2025-12-02

摘要: 在城市地质和矿山地质勘探中,采取原状土样进行相关室内试验,是获得岩土参数的重要途径之一,而 钻探取土过程中会对土样产生一定程度的扰动。为研究勘探取土工艺对软土地层取土质量的影响,以上海地区软土 地层为例,使用螺纹钻、三翼钻和岩芯管3种钻进工艺,分别与常规厚壁取土器和镀锌铁皮土样筒组合、隐形轴阀式取 土器和弓形单缝互压扣合式土样筒组合的取土工艺进行了取土对比试验。通过对土样外观形态、无侧限抗压强度指 标和扰动性指标进行对比,分析了不同勘探取土工艺对取土质量的影响。研究结果表明:取土工艺对取土质量的影 响大于钻进工艺的影响;在钻进工艺方面,螺纹钻钻进工艺的取土质量最好、三翼钻次之、岩芯管最差;采用隐形轴阀 式取土器和弓形单缝互压扣合式土样筒组合工艺所取土样质量优于常规厚壁取土器和镀锌铁皮土样筒组合工艺。 螺纹钻钻进工艺采取土样的无侧限抗压强度平均值比三翼钻高15%左右,比岩芯管高21%左右。利用自重应力下的 孔隙比变化率作为土样扰动性大小的定量评价指标,取样质量最差的勘探取土工艺所取土样的孔隙比变化率平均值 比取样质量最好的提升30.8%。研究反映出选择最优的勘探取土工艺,可显著提升软土地层的取土质量,对于获得 更加真实的岩土参数数据、提高城市地质和矿山地质勘探质量具有重要意义。

关键词: 城市地质 矿山地质 钻进工艺 取土工艺 取土质量 土样扰动

Abstract: In urban and mine geological exploration,obtaining undisturbed soil samples for related indoor tests is one of the important ways to acquire geotechnical parameters.However,the process of drilling and soil sampling will cause a certain degree of disturbance to the soil samples.To study the impact of exploration soil sampling techniques on the quality of soil sam ples in soft soil layers,taking the soft soil layers in Shanghai as an example,three drilling techniques,namely,threaded drill, three-wing drill and core tube,were combined with two soil sampling techniques,namely,conventional thick-walled soil sampler and galvanized iron sheet soil sample tube,and the invisible shaft valve soil sampler and the bow-shaped single slit interlocking soil sample tube,respectively,for soil sampling comparison tests.Through the comparative analysis of the appearance of soil samples,unconfined compressive strength index and disturbance index,the influence of different exploration soil sampling tech niques on the quality of soil samples was analyzed.The study results show that the influence of soil sampling techniques on the quality of soil samples is greater than that of drilling techniques.Among the drilling techniques,the soil sampling quality of the threaded drill drilling technique is the best,followed by the three-wing drill,and the core tube is the worst.The quality of soil samples obtained by the soil sampling technique combining the invisible shaft valve soil sampler and the bow-shaped single slit interlocking soil sample tube is better than that of the combination of the conventional thick-walled soil sampler and the galva nized iron sheet soil sample tube.The average unconfined compressive strength of soil samples taken by the threaded drill drill ing technique is about 15% higher than that of the three-wing drill and about 21% higher than that of the core tube.Using the change rate of void ratio under self-weight stress as a quantitative index of soil sample disturbance,the average change rate of void ratio of soil samples obtained by the worst exploration soil sampling technique is 30.8% higher than that of the best.The study reflects that choosing the optimal exploration soil sampling technique can significantly improve the quality of soil samples in soft soil layers,which is of great significance for obtaining more accurate geotechnical parameter data and improving the quality of urban and mine geological exploration.

Key words: urban geology,mining geology,drilling technique,sampling technique,quality of sampling,soil sample dis turbance

中图分类号: