采场结构参数及充填配比优化的FLAC3D数值模拟

金属矿山 ›› 2016, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (03): 25-29.

采场结构参数及充填配比优化的FLAC3D数值模拟

刘志义¹，甘德清¹，薛振林¹，赵海鑫¹，何水清²

1.华北理工大学矿业工程学院，河北唐山 063000；2.西藏华泰龙矿业开发有限公司，西藏拉萨 850200

出版日期:2016-03-15 发布日期:2016-05-17

Optimization of Structure Parameters and Backfill Ratio of the Stope Based on FLAC3D

Liu Zhiyi¹，Gan Deqing¹，Xue Zhenlin¹，Zhao Haixin¹，He Shuiqing²

1.School of Mining Engineering，North China University of Science and Technology，Tangshan 063000，China；2.Tibet Huatailong Mining Development Co.，Ltd，Lhasa 850200，China

Online:2016-03-15 Published:2016-05-17

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了保证矿山安全高效开采，通过分析影响采场稳定性关键因素及破坏机理，应用数值模拟法对二步矿柱在不同结构参数和两侧不同充填配比开采条件的稳定性进行分析，优选出安全高效的一步采场充填配比和二步采场的结构参数。采用FLAC3D数值模拟，计算和分析在开采过程中，不同结构参数和两侧不同充填配比的采场顶板的应力、应力分布区域面积及位移变化特征，得出各不同方案的采场顶板稳定情况。结果表明:采场受两侧充填体配比的影响较为明显，一步采场灰砂比由1∶6改变到1∶8时，对二步采场的稳定性影响较小；灰砂比小于1∶8和采场宽度大于18 m时，采场顶板的拉应力和位移的变化率逐渐变大，采场的稳定性迅速降低。因此，综合矿山生产安全、高效及成本考虑，建议一步采场充填配比为1∶8、二步采场的宽度为18 m。

关键词: 采场结构参数, 充填配比, 稳定性, 有限元计算

Abstract: In order to ensure efficient production capacity and mining safety of the stope，3D-FEM was conducted to analyze the stability of the stope with different structure parameters and filling ratio based on the analysis of the stope-stability of the key factors and failure mechanisms，and the safe and reasonable stope parameters were selected.Stress，stress distribution area and displacement of stope roof of different structure parameters and fill ratio were calculated and analyzed to judge the stability of the stope at different conditions by adopting the FLAC3D.Result showed that，stability of stope at both sides was obviously affected by the backfill ratio.Stability of the stope was changed less when the backfill ratio varies from 1∶6 to 1∶8.The change rate of the stress and displacement of stope roof was a growing trend，and the stability of the stope was lowered when the backfill ratio was less than 1∶8 and the width of the stope was more than 18metres.So the suggested backfill ratio of the first-step stope was 1∶8，and the width of the second-step stope was 18meters based on the synthesized consideration of the safety，high efficiency and costs.

Key words: Stope structure parameters, Backfill ratio, Stability, FEM simulation

刘志义, 甘德清, 薛振林, 赵海鑫, 何水清. 采场结构参数及充填配比优化的FLAC3D数值模拟[J]. 金属矿山, 2016, 45(03): 25-29.

LIU Zhi-Yi, GAN De-Qing, XUE Zhen-Lin, ZHAO Hai-Xin, HE Shui-Qing. Optimization of Structure Parameters and Backfill Ratio of the Stope Based on FLAC3D[J]. Metal Mine, 2016, 45(03): 25-29.

[1]	肖益盖, 刘允秋, 汪为平, 王雨波, 夏才初, 徐晨, 吕志涛, 林梓梁. 某大型地下硐室群稳定性分析及加固技术研究[J]. 金属矿山, 2020, 49(09): 96-103.
[2]	石满生, 许威, 张美道, . 基于 Rhino-Griddle-Flac3D的矿体建模与地表稳定性分析[J]. 金属矿山, 2020, 49(08): 182-187.
[3]	赵兴东, 李怀宾, 张姝婧, 杨晓明, 张天航. 青龙沟金矿露天转地下采场稳定性分析及控制[J]. 金属矿山, 2020, 49(04): 10-14.
[4]	严雅静, 顾水杰, 于祥, 周昀, 赵康. 基于未确知测度理论的巷道围岩稳定性研究[J]. 金属矿山, 2019, 48(11): 20-26.
[5]	郭庆彪, 王亮, 吕鑫, 姜传礼. 基于云模型与模糊层次分析的老采空区建设场地稳定性评价[J]. 金属矿山, 2019, 48(11): 43-48.
[6]	侯征, 朱自强, 许小燕, 肖财, 吴顺川, 张力. 预应力锚索锚固力监测点经济高效布设方法研究[J]. 金属矿山, 2019, 48(11): 54-61.
[7]	邱胜光. 降雨入渗对非饱和土体边坡稳定性影响及治理对策[J]. 金属矿山, 2019, 48(11): 62-67.
[8]	朱伟. 采煤塌陷区土地建筑利用技术与工程应用[J]. 金属矿山, 2019, 48(11): 176-171.
[9]	郭庆彪, 李英明, 王亮, 吕鑫. 废弃采空区地基稳定性极简评价指标体系构建[J]. 金属矿山, 2019, 48(09): 179-184.
[10]	王卫东, 朱万成, 张鹏海, 王雷鸣. 基于微震参数的岩体稳定性评价方法及其在Spark平台的实现[J]. 金属矿山, 2019, 48(08): 147-156.
[11]	郝喆, 杨青潮, 周素航. 生态修复尾矿坝的边坡稳定性评价[J]. 金属矿山, 2019, 48(08): 162-166.
[12]	汪为平, 陆玉根, 段庆豹, 侯大德, 汪亮, 孙秀柱. 崩落法开采“悬留”大型采空区协同处置技术研究[J]. 金属矿山, 2019, 48(07): 8-13.
[13]	何标庆, 简文彬. 大型机械化作业下固体废物充填处理超大型采空区[J]. 金属矿山, 2019, 48(07): 19-25.
[14]	闫奇, 杨福波, 陈刚, 王晓军, 隋璨. 动静组合作用下大跨度凿岩硐室稳定性分析[J]. 金属矿山, 2019, 48(07): 41-48.
[15]	许梦国, 谭涛, 程爱平, 王平, 李丹峰, 杨洋. 程潮铁矿充填体下部崩落采场稳定性分析[J]. 金属矿山, 2019, 48(05): 14-20.