轻型充填挡墙力学分析与构筑工艺

金属矿山 ›› 2016, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (09): 58-61.

轻型充填挡墙力学分析与构筑工艺

程海勇^1,2，吴爱祥^1,2，罗淦华^1,2，王贻明^1,2

1.北京科技大学土木与环境工程学院,北京 100083；2.金属矿山高效开采与安全教育部重点实验室,北京 100083

出版日期:2016-09-15 发布日期:2016-10-18
基金资助:
基金项目国家自然科学基金项目（编号：51574013，51374034)。

Mechanics Analysis and Construction Process of Light-weight Retaining Wall for Backfill

Cheng Haiyong^1,2，Wu Aixiang^1,2，Luo Ganhua^1,2，Wang Yiming^1,2

1.School of Civil and Environment Engineering，University of Science and Technology Beijing，Beijing 100083，China；2.Key Laboratory of High-Efficient Mining and Safety of Metal Mines，Ministry of Education，Beijing 100083，China

Online:2016-09-15 Published:2016-10-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 充填料浆与挡墙作用机理复杂，充填挡墙的稳定性直接影响采充周期和回采安全。根据静水压力理论对料浆高度低于挡墙和高于挡墙2种情况分别进行了力学分析，同时计算出了最大扭矩作用点。对挡墙构筑工艺，包括位置选择、钢丝绳紧固及挂网、木板安装及尼龙布铺设工艺进行了详细阐述。理论分析及现场应用表明：挡墙应力集中表现在2 m高度范围内，底部可适当加固。轻型挡墙制作周期短，大大缩短了采充循环时间，为安全回采提供了可靠保障。

关键词: 充填挡墙, 力学分析, 膏体, 全尾砂, 工艺优化

Abstract: There is a complex interaction mechanism between filling slurry and retaining，and the stability of filling retaining wall has a direct influence on mining and filling cycle and mining safety.According to the theory of hydrostatic pressures，the mechanical analysis of the two kinds of slurry height which one was higher than filling retaining wall and the other was lower than retaining wall was carried out.In addition，its maximum torque point was calculated.The construction techniques of the retaining wall，including position selection，wire rope fastening and hanging net，wood board installation and nylon cloth laying process were described in detail.Theoretical analysis and field application showed that the stress concentration of the retaining wall was expressed in the height range of 2 m and the bottom can be properly reinforced.The production cycle of light retaining wall was short，greatly reducing cycle time of mining and backfilling and providing a reliable guarantee for safe mining.

Key words: Filling retaining wall, Mechanics analysis, Paste, Unclassified tailings, Process optimization

程海勇, 吴爱祥, 罗淦华, 王贻明. 轻型充填挡墙力学分析与构筑工艺[J]. 金属矿山, 2016, 45(09): 58-61.

CHENG Hai-Yong, WU Ai-Xiang, LUO Gan-Hua, WANG Yi-Ming. Mechanics Analysis and Construction Process of Light-weight Retaining Wall for Backfill[J]. Metal Mine, 2016, 45(09): 58-61.

[1]	程爱平, 董福松, 戴顺意, 舒鹏飞, 付子祥. 全尾砂胶结充填体分层特性试验研究[J]. 金属矿山, 2020, 49(08): 13-19.
[2]	杜加法, 刘晓光, 王京生, 侯晨, 朱兆文 . 基于 L管实验的全尾砂膏体流变特性研究[J]. 金属矿山, 2020, 49(08): 20-24.
[3]	于恩毅, 黄旭东, 王珍岐, 黄晢航, 龚甲桂 . 废石掺量对胶结充填体强度及变形破坏的影响[J]. 金属矿山, 2020, 49(08): 44-48.
[4]	杨超, 郭利杰, 李文臣 . 大流量全尾砂膏体料浆管道输送参数计算与分析[J]. 金属矿山, 2020, 49(08): 55-60.
[5]	石满生, 许威, 张美道, . 基于 Rhino-Griddle-Flac3D的矿体建模与地表稳定性分析[J]. 金属矿山, 2020, 49(08): 182-187.
[6]	张国胜, 杨晓炳, 郭斌, 陈彦亭, 涂光富. 全尾砂充填采矿低成本新型充填胶凝材料研究与发展方向[J]. 金属矿山, 2020, 49(07): 1-9.
[7]	张敏杰 , 张俊铭. 高硫超细全尾砂膏体充填配比强度试验研究[J]. 金属矿山, 2020, 49(06): 161-166.
[8]	王富林, 袁正平, 陈国梁, 杨仕教. 膏体—地聚物协同效应的铀尾矿井下充填处置体系构建[J]. 金属矿山, 2020, 50(05): 144-150.
[9]	郭斌, 梁峰, 吴凡, 涂光富, 高谦. 高官营铁矿高强度新型胶凝材料研究[J]. 金属矿山, 2019, 48(11): 8-13.
[10]	黄丹, 杨超, 史采星, 郭利杰. 吕梁山区表层黄土似膏体充填适应性试验研究[J]. 金属矿山, 2019, 48(09): 59-64.
[11]	梁峰, 高谦, 丛革臣, 杨寿军. 思山岭铁矿超细全尾砂固结粉充填胶凝材料研究[J]. 金属矿山, 2019, 48(08): 198-200.
[12]	周华荣, 许永伟, 张慧婷, 翁存建, 王鹏程3, 罗仙平. 青海某硫化铅锌矿选矿工艺优化研究[J]. 金属矿山, 2019, 48(07): 103-107.
[13]	寇云鹏, 杨纪光, 齐兆军, 杜加法, 荆晓东, 盛宇航. 某金矿压滤尾砂膏体充填综合性能试验[J]. 金属矿山, 2019, 48(04): 31-35.
[14]	祝传奇, 寇珏, 孙发昭, 黄文昊, 马淑贤, 孙春宝. 提高某高镍锍中一次合金回收效果的研究[J]. 金属矿山, 2019, 48(03): 95-99.
[15]	南楠, 朱一民, 韩跃新, 陈金鑫. 采用磷灰石新型常温捕收剂DJX-6优化某铁尾矿中磷的回收工艺[J]. 金属矿山, 2019, 48(02): 121-124.