自然崩落法漏斗放矿规律三维模拟

金属矿山 ›› 2018, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (03): 151-155.

自然崩落法漏斗放矿规律三维模拟

黄明清¹，王贻明²，高谦²

1.福州大学紫金矿业学院，福建福州 350116；2.北京科技大学土木与资源工程学院，北京 100083

出版日期:2018-03-15 发布日期:2018-03-20
基金资助:
基金项目：中国博士后科学基金项目(编号：2017M610773)，国家重点研发计划项目(编号：2017YFC0602900)，国家自然科学基金项目(编号：51674012)。

Three-dimensional Simulation of Hopper Ore Drawing Regularity in Natural Caving

Huang Mingqing¹，Wang Yiming²，Gao Qian²

1.College of Zijin Mining,Fuzhou University,Fuzhou 350116,China；2.Civil and Resource Engineering School,University of Science and Technology Beijing,Beijing 100083,China

Online:2018-03-15 Published:2018-03-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了优选自然崩落法低损贫的放矿方案，引进REBOP软件开展镍矿下盘、上盘及中部多排漏斗放矿规律三维数值模拟及损贫预测。结果表明，3种方案均匀放矿30 d后放矿点上方均形成近70 m的移动单元体及超30 m的放矿单元体。矿体下盘、上盘及中部放矿时平均出矿率依次为85.6%、85.4%及85.7%，出矿品位依次为0.56%、0.43%及0.47%。此外，下盘放矿时极限放出矿量及放出矿石品位均优于其他方案，且放矿周期内矿石品位均达到设计品位，故优选为最佳放矿方案。

关键词: 崩落法, 损贫预测, 极限放出矿量, 放矿优化

Abstract: To obtain an optimized ore-drawing scheme with low ore loss and dilution in natural caving,the software REBOP was introduced to conduct three-dimensional simulation and loss-dilution prediction of multiple hopper drawing with regard to hanging wall,footwall and medium drawing in nickel mine.Results showed that an Isolated Movement Zone (IMZ) of nearly 70 m in height and an Isolated Extraction Zone (IEZ) of higher than 30 m were formed at drawing points after uniformly ore drawing for 30 days under three schemes.The ore-drawing percentages of hanging wall,footwall and medium drawing were sequentially 85.6%,85.4% and 85.7%,while the drawn ore grades were sequentially 0.56%,0.43% and 0.47%.Additionally,the maximal drawn ore volume and the ore grades of footwall were higher than that of other schemes,and drawn grades throughout the production period reached the designed grades,therefore the footwall drawing was selected as the optimized ore drawing scheme.

Key words: Caving, Loss-dilution prediction, Maximal ore-drawn volume, Optimization of ore drawing

黄明清, 王贻明, 高谦. 自然崩落法漏斗放矿规律三维模拟[J]. 金属矿山, 2018, 47(03): 151-155.

HUANG Ming-Qing, WANG Yi-Ming, GAO Qian. Three-dimensional Simulation of Hopper Ore Drawing Regularity in Natural Caving[J]. Metal Mine, 2018, 47(03): 151-155.

[1]	龚文柏, 吴万君. 镜铁山矿倾斜矿体上盘边角矿回采方案研究[J]. 金属矿山, 2020, 49(07): 40-46.
[2]	杨贺 , 路增祥, 张国建 . 基于中心复合响应面的覆盖层岩块粒径与密度实验分析[J]. 金属矿山, 2020, 49(06): 150-155.
[3]	黄明清, 陈霖, 李兵磊, 刘青灵. 长走向平行钒铁矿体协同开采方案研究[J]. 金属矿山, 2020, 50(05): 55-60.
[4]	王刘宝, 刘艳章, 尹东, 姜维, 张国权, 蔡原田. 大冶铁矿同阶段崩落法转充填法开采隔离间柱合理宽度确定[J]. 金属矿山, 2020, 50(05): 89-94.
[5]	李海英, 任思潼, 丁航行, 赵云峰. 崩落法分区交界矿体连续开采技术[J]. 金属矿山, 2019, 48(09): 41-44.
[6]	陆玉根, 汪为平, 江权. 大规模深部开采诱发上覆岩体变形规律研究[J]. 金属矿山, 2019, 48(09): 45-51.
[7]	宋德林, 任凤玉, 刘德祥, 阚景文, 孙丁丁. 西石门铁矿缓倾斜破碎矿体崩落法开采损失贫化控制[J]. 金属矿山, 2019, 48(08): 7-12.
[8]	于志宏, 张治强, 宋超, 马驰. 放矿口尺寸对放矿效果的影响[J]. 金属矿山, 2019, 48(08): 27-31.
[9]	汪为平, 陆玉根, 段庆豹, 侯大德, 汪亮, 孙秀柱. 崩落法开采“悬留”大型采空区协同处置技术研究[J]. 金属矿山, 2019, 48(07): 8-13.
[10]	常贯峰, 路增祥. 铲入深度对无底柱分段崩落法放出体形态的影响[J]. 金属矿山, 2019, 48(05): 27-31.
[11]	时磊, 汪龙, 黄滚, 王满. 某铁矿矿岩中含水量对放出体形态影响的试验研究[J]. 金属矿山, 2019, 48(05): 32-36.
[12]	韩连生, 杨宇江. 基于颗粒流方法的端部放矿力链特性研究[J]. 金属矿山, 2019, 48(04): 36-40.
[13]	宋德林, 任凤玉, 刘德祥, 阚景文, 孙丁丁. 西石门铁矿北区高应力破碎矿体崩落法开采技术[J]. 金属矿山, 2019, 48(03): 41-47.
[14]	林友, 尤本勇, 董继德, 夏建波, 文义明. 观天厂铜矿倾斜薄矿体开采工艺研究[J]. 金属矿山, 2018, 47(2): 46-49.
[15]	者亚雷, 侯克鹏, 程涌, 杨八九. 自然崩落法底部结构应力状态研究[J]. 金属矿山, 2018, 47(2): 61-63.