青海某硫化铅锌矿选矿工艺优化研究

金属矿山 ›› 2019, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (07): 103-107.

青海某硫化铅锌矿选矿工艺优化研究

周华荣^1,2,3，许永伟^1,2,3，张慧婷^1,2,3，翁存建^1,2,3，王鹏程^1,2,3，罗仙平^1,2,3,4

1. 西部矿业集团科技发展有限公司，青海西宁 810006；2. 青海省有色矿产资源工程技术研究中心，青海西宁810006；3. 青海省高原矿物加工工程与综合利用重点实验室，青海西宁810006；4. 江西理工大学资源与环境工程学院，江西赣州 341000

出版日期:2019-07-15 发布日期:2019-09-17
基金资助:
基金项目：国家自然科学基金项目(编号：51374116)，青海省重大科技专项（编号：2018-GX-A7）。

Optimization Research of a Lead-zinc Sulfide Ore Beneficiation Process in Qinghai

Zhou Huarong^1,2,3， Xu Yongwei^1,2,3， Zhang Huiting^1,2,3， Weng Cunjian1,2,3， Wang Pengcheng^1,2,3， Luo Xianping^1,2,3,4

1. Technology Development of Western Mining Group Co.， Ltd. Xining 810006， China； 2. Research Center of Nonferrous Mineral Resources of Engineering and Technology in Qinghai Province， Xining 810006， China； 3. Qinghai Province Key Laboratory of Plateau Mineral Processing Engineering and Comprehensive Utilization， Xining 810006， China； 4. School of Resources and Environmental Engineering， Jiangxi University of Science and Technology， Ganzhou 341000， China

Online:2019-07-15 Published:2019-09-17

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 青海某铅锌硫化矿石选矿厂采用中性介质下优先浮铅—锌硫混浮—锌硫分离工艺流程处理矿石，导致生产不够稳定，选矿指标不理想。为解决此问题，采用中性介质下优先选铅—碱性介质下优先选锌—硫酸调浆再选硫的原则流程进行了选矿试验。结果表明：矿石在磨矿细度为-0.074 mm占55%的情况下，采用1粗2精1扫选铅、1粗2精1扫选锌、1次浮选选硫流程处理矿石，获得了铅品位为70.72%、含锌2.14%、含硫19.98%、含金1.92 g/t、含银1 322.45 g/t，铅回收率为91.78%、金回收率为14.28%、银回收率为76.29%的铅精矿；锌品位为48.86%、含铅0.26%、含硫32.67%，锌回收率为97.88%的锌精矿；硫品位为47.44%、含金0.67 g/t、含铅0.11%、含锌0.17%，硫回收率为64.14%、金回收率为80.86%的硫精矿。新工艺流程更简洁，生产更稳定顺畅，电耗和药剂成本均有所下降，在铅、锌精矿质量指标相当的情况下，铅、锌回收率分别提高了0.50和4.32个百分点，伴生金银和硫精矿指标也得到了改善。

关键词: 铅锌硫化矿石, 优先浮选, 工艺优化, 中性介质, 碱性介质

Abstract: Preferential flotation of lead at neutral medium， mixed flotation of zinc-sulfur and separation of zinc-sulfur process were adopted to treat ores in a lead-zinc sulfide ores concentrator of Qinghai province， which caused unstable production and unsatisfactory index. In order to solve the problems， beneficial tests was carried out in the process of preferential flotation of lead at neutral medium， preferential flotation of zinc at alkaline medium and sulfur separation after pulp condition with sulfuric acid. The results indicated that in the case of grinding fineness of -0.074 mm accounting for 55%， lead was selected with one roughing-two cleaning-one scavenging， zinc was selected with one roughing-two cleaning-one scavenging and sulfur was selected with one flotation. The lead concentrate was obtained with lead grade of 70.72%， zinc grade of 2.14%， sulfur grade of 19.98%， gold grade of 1.92 g/t， silver grade of 1 322.45 g/t， lead recovery of 91.78%， gold recovery of 14.28% and silver recovery of 76.29%. The zinc concentrate was obtained with zinc grade of 48.86%， lead grade of 0.26%， sulfur grade of 32.67% and zinc recovery of 97.88%. The sulfur concentrate was obtained with sulfur grade of 47.44%， gold grade of 0.67 g/t， lead grade of 0.11%， zinc grade of 0.17%， sulfur recovery of 64.14% and gold recovery of 80.86%. The new process is more concise， and the production is more stable and smooth. Also， power consumption and reagent costs are reduced. In the same grade index of lead and zinc， the recovery of lead and zinc were increased by 0.50 and 4.32 percentage points， respectively. In addition， the flotation index of associated gold and silver were improved.

Key words: Lead-zinc sulfide ore, preferential flotation, process optimization, neutral medium, alkaline medium

周华荣, 许永伟, 张慧婷, 翁存建, 王鹏程3, 罗仙平. 青海某硫化铅锌矿选矿工艺优化研究[J]. 金属矿山, 2019, 48(07): 103-107.

ZHOU Hua-Rong, XU Yong-Wei, ZHANG Hui-Ting, WENG Cun-Jian, WANG Peng-Cheng-3, LUO Xian-Ping. Optimization Research of a Lead-zinc Sulfide Ore Beneficiation Process in Qinghai[J]. Metal Mine, 2019, 48(07): 103-107.

[1]	陈雄, 何名飞, 卜浩, 汤优优, 贾敏. 东北某低品位含银铅锌矿低碱分离试验研究[J]. 金属矿山, 2023, 52(07): 219-225.
[2]	李鑫, 邓荣东, 王锦荣, 陈钦, 张承杰, 何环银, 林建绥, 刘想想. 福建某铅锌浮选尾矿再选试验研究[J]. 金属矿山, 2023, 52(03): 127-134.
[3]	王朝, 杨延宙, 谢兰馨, 冯媛媛, 许永伟, 赖春华. 提高铜锌铁矿石中伴生金银指标的试验研究[J]. 金属矿山, 2023, 52(01): 194-198.
[4]	李少平, 王锦柯, 张伟光, 李杰, 董法. 新疆某低品位硫化铅锌矿石选矿试验研究[J]. 金属矿山, 2022, 51(11): 120-125.
[5]	许洪峰, 牛艳萍. 黑龙江某矽卡岩型铅锌伴生银矿石选矿试验[J]. 金属矿山, 2022, 51(10): 101-106.
[6]	巩明辉, 李国栋, 王婷霞. 某高氧化率铅锌矿选矿试验研究[J]. 金属矿山, 2022, 51(05): 117-122.
[7]	罗仙平, 何坤忠, 周贺鹏, 暴永泉. 青海夏乌日塔铜铅锌多金属矿工艺矿物学特征及浮选原则工艺的确定[J]. 金属矿山, 2022, 51(04): 122-130.
[8]	汪志平, 邹坚坚, 王成行, 李强. 高银低铅低锌多金属矿浮选试验研究[J]. 金属矿山, 2022, 51(03): 118-123.
[9]	李杰林, 杨承业, 周科平, 李志宏. 地下矿山无轨与有轨联合开采的采矿工艺耦合协同度评价[J]. 金属矿山, 2021, 50(03): 74-79.
[10]	李国栋, 邱廷省, 郭海宁, 严华山. 某含金复杂铜硫矿石低碱度浮选工艺试验研究[J]. 金属矿山, 2020, 49(11): 95-99.
[11]	谭晓桐, 王芷晴, 任秀君, 韩天放, 赵鑫. 生物浸出电子垃圾中关键金属的研究进展[J]. 金属矿山, 2020, 49(11): 71-78.
[12]	邹勤, 龙冰, 雷小明, 杨长安, 刘诚. 国外某低品位铜锌硫化矿浮选分离试验研究[J]. 金属矿山, 2020, 49(09): 111-117.
[13]	吕超, 李斯, 王海博, 梁溢强. 缅甸某氧硫混合铅锌矿石浮选试验研究[J]. 金属矿山, 2019, 48(11): 88-93.
[14]	梁焘茂, 邱廷省, 艾光华. 内蒙古某低品位铅锌硫化矿石铅锌浮选试验[J]. 金属矿山, 2019, 48(07): 97-102.
[15]	董艳红, 陈代雄, 杨建文, 肖骏, 胡波, 曾惠明. 某铜铅锌多金属硫化矿石的浮选试验[J]. 金属矿山, 2019, 48(07): 92-96.

扫码分享