欢迎访问《金属矿山》杂志官方网站,今天是 分享到:

金属矿山 ›› 2020, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (07): 25-32.

• 采矿工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

胶结充填体动力试验及其爆破响应模拟研究

吴振坤,金爱兵,陈帅军   

  1. 1. 山东金鼎矿业有限责任公司,山东 淄博 255000;2. 北京科技大学土木与资源工程学院,北京 100083;3. 北京科技大学金属矿山高效开采与安全教育部重点实验室,北京 100083
  • 出版日期:2020-07-15 发布日期:2020-08-20
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(编号:51804018)

Study on Cemented Tailing Backfill Dynamic Characteristics and Its Blasting Response Simulation

Wu Zhenkun,Jin Aibing,Chen Shuaijun   

  1. 1. Shandong Jinding Mining Co., Ltd.,Zibo 255000,China;2. School of Civil and Resource Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing,Beijing 100083,China;3. Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Efficient Mining and Safety of Metal Mines,University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083,China
  • Online:2020-07-15 Published:2020-08-20

摘要: 空场嗣后充填采矿方法被越来越多地应用到地下金属矿床开采中,胶结充填体不仅要承受上部静荷载,还要面临二步骤采矿爆破冲击,因此研究胶结充填体动力学特性及其爆破响应对于保证采矿安全具有重要意义。通过单轴抗压强度(UCS)以及霍普金森压杆(Split Hopkinson Pressure Bars, SHPB)对胶结充填体进行动静载试验,在此基础上,应用ANSYS/LS-DYNA 软件对二步回采过程中的胶结充填体爆破响应特征进行了模拟研究。结果表明:①胶结充填体动抗压强度随着应变速率增加而增加,近似为线性关系,高应变条件下,其动抗压强度约为静抗压强度的2倍;②二步骤采矿爆破时充填体保护层厚度对振动响应速度和有效应力有明显影响,因而有必要为充填体预留设足够厚度的保护层,否则会导致充填体振动响应速度和有效应力过大;③起爆方式对胶结充填体爆破响应也有明显影响,孔口起爆时,保护层厚度要大于1.5 m才能满足充填体安全要求,而孔底起爆时,保护层厚度需达到1.8 m。上述分析对于充填采矿中胶结充填体强度以及二步回采中保护层厚度、起爆方式设计具有一定的参考意义。

关键词: 充填开采, 胶结充填体, 霍普金森压杆试验, 爆破响应, LS-DYNA, 数值模拟

Abstract: Open-stope backfilling mining method is widely used in underground metal mining.The cemented tailing backfill not only bears the static load pressure,but also faces the blasting impact in the second-step mining process.Therefore,it is of great significance to investigate the dynamic characteristics and blasting response of cemented tailing backfill to ensure mining safety.Static and dynamic load tests were carried out through uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) and Split Hopkinson Pressure Bars (SHPB).And ANSYS/LS-DYNA software was used to simulate the blasting response law of cemented tailing backfill in the second-step mining process.The study results show that:① dynamic compressive strength of consolidated backfill increases with the increase of strain rate,and they are approximately linear,the dynamic compressive strength is about twice of the static compressive strength under high strain conditions;② the thickness of the protective layer of backfill has a significant impact on the vibration speed and effective stress when blasting during second-step mining,the protective layer should be remained enough in the second-step mining progress,otherwise,the vibration speed of backfill and the effective stress of the backfill will be too large;③the initiation mode also has obvious influence on the blasting response of cemented tailing backfilling,as using hole-top initiation,the protective layer thickness should be 1.5 m,which can satisfy the cemented tailing backfill safety demand,however,for hole-bottom initiation, the protective layer thickness should be 1.8 m.The above study results is of certain reference significance to the design of the strength of cemented tailing backfill and the thickness of protective layer and initiation mode in second-step mining process.

Key words: Filling mining, Cemented tailing backfill, Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar (SHPB) test, Blasting response, LS-DYNA, Numerical simulation