欢迎访问《金属矿山》杂志官方网站,今天是 分享到:
×

扫码分享

金属矿山 ›› 2023, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (05): 306-313.

• 安全与环保 • 上一篇    下一篇

典型铁氧化物对 Cu( Ⅱ )的吸附性能研究

张是洲1,2 唐学芳1,2 吴 勇1,2 张启蒙1,2 谢 政3
  

  1. 1. 成都理工大学环境与土木工程学院,四川 成都 610059;2. 地质灾害防治与地质环境保护国家重点实验室,四川 成都 610059;3. 四川省农业科学院,四川 成都 610066
  • 出版日期:2023-05-15 发布日期:2023-06-15
  • 基金资助:
    四川省科技厅重点研发计划项目(编号:2019YFS0509,2018SZ0327)。

Study on Adsorption Properties of Typical Iron Oxides on Cu (Ⅱ )

ZHANG Shizhou1,2 TANG Xuefang1,2 WU Yong1,2 ZANG Qimeng1,2 XIE Zheng3 #br#   

  1. 1. College of Environment and Civil Engineering,Chengdu University of Technology,Chengdu 610059,China;2. State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection,Chengdu 610059,China;3. Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Chengdu 610066,China
  • Online:2023-05-15 Published:2023-06-15

摘要: 为研究针铁矿、赤铁矿、磁铁矿和水铁矿对模拟 Cu(Ⅱ )污染废水中的 Cu( Ⅱ )去除性能,采用 XRD、FTIR、BET 比表面积及电位滴定对 4 种铁氧化物进行表征分析,通过静态和动态迁移试验对 4 种铁氧化物吸附 Cu( Ⅱ ) 的性能进行综合比较。 结果表明:① 投加量为 1 g / L,Cu(Ⅱ )初始浓度为 50 mg / L 时,4 种铁氧化物对 Cu(Ⅱ )的吸附 饱和时间为 30 min,在弱酸性条件下对 Cu(Ⅱ )的吸附效果较为显著,针铁矿、赤铁矿、水铁矿和磁铁矿对 Cu(Ⅱ )平衡 吸附率分别为 61. 02%、50. 72%、70. 58%、46. 65%。 ② 针铁矿和水铁矿对 Cu( Ⅱ )吸附过程为单分子层化学吸附,赤 铁矿和磁铁矿则更符合 Freundlich 方程,以非均匀多分子层化学吸附为主。 ③ Cu( Ⅱ )在迁移过程中,主要在含吸附 剂的土柱表层和中层累积,且远大于深层,水铁矿对 Cu( Ⅱ ) 的阻滞和吸附能力优于针铁矿。 ④ 4 种铁氧化物对 Cu(Ⅱ )的吸附性能由好到差依次为水铁矿、针铁矿、赤铁矿、磁铁矿。

关键词: 铁氧化物, Cu(Ⅱ ), 吸附动力学, 吸附等温线, Cu(Ⅱ )运移

Abstract: In order to study the removal performance of goethite,hematite,magnetite and ferrihydrite on Cu(Ⅱ ) in simulated Cu(Ⅱ ) contaminated wastewater,four kinds of iron oxides were characterized by XRD,FTIR,BET specific surface area and potentiometric titration. The adsorption performance of four kinds of iron oxides on Cu(Ⅱ ) was compared by static and dynamic migration tests. The results showed that :① When the dosage was 1 g / L and the initial concentration of Cu(Ⅱ ) was 50 mg / L,the adsorption saturation time of Cu(Ⅱ ) by four iron oxides was 30 min. The adsorption effect of Cu(Ⅱ ) was significant under weak acidic conditions. The equilibrium adsorption rates of Cu(Ⅱ ) by goethite,hematite,ferrihydrite and magnetite were 61. 02%,50. 72%,70. 58% and 46. 65%,respectively. ② The adsorption process of goethite and ferrihydrite on Cu(Ⅱ ) is monolayer chemical adsorption,while hematite and magnetite are more in line with Freundlich equation,which is dominated by non-uniform multi-layer chemical adsorption. ③ During the migration process,Cu(Ⅱ ) mainly accumulated in the surface and middle layers of the soil column containing adsorbents,and was much larger than that in the deep layer. The retardation and adsorption capacity of ferrihydrite to Cu(Ⅱ ) was better than that of goethite. ④ The adsorption performance of four kinds of iron oxides on Cu(Ⅱ ) from good to bad was ferrihydrite,goethite,hematite and magnetite.

Key words: iron oxide,Cu(Ⅱ ),adsorption kinetics,adsorption isotherm,Cu(Ⅱ ) migration