高陡岩质边坡“面—点—面”稳定性综合评价方法———以安太堡露天矿为例

金属矿山 ›› 2023, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (11): 241-252.

高陡岩质边坡“面—点—面”稳定性综合评价方法———以安太堡露天矿为例

陶志刚^1,² 刘珂源^1,² 杨晓杰^1,² 李静涛³ 张鹏⁴ 李赓照^1,2

1. 深部岩土力学与地下工程国家重点实验室,北京 100083;2. 中国矿业大学(北京)力学与建筑工程学院,北京 100083;3. 中煤平朔集团有限公司地质测量中心,山西朔州 036000;4. 青岛理工大学土木工程学院,山东青岛,266033

出版日期:2023-11-15 发布日期:2024-01-02
基金资助:
浙江省重点研发计划主动设计项目(编号:2019C03104)。

"Plane-Point-Plane" Stability Integrated Evaluation Method of High and Steep Rock Slope:A Case Study of Antaibao Open-pit Mine

TAO Zhigang^1,2 LIU Keyuan^1,2 YANG Xiaojie^1,2 LI Jingtao³ ZHANG Peng⁴ LI Gengzhao^1,2 #br#

1. State Key Laboratory for Geomechanics & Deep Underground Engineering,Beijing 100083,China;2. School of Mechanics and Civil Engineering,China University of Mining and Technology-Beijing,Beijing 100083,China;3. Geological Survey Center of China Coal Pingshuo Group Go. ,Ltd. ,Pingshuo 036000,China;4. School of Civil Engineering,Qingdao University of Technology,Qingdao 266033,China

Online:2023-11-15 Published:2024-01-02

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了能够有效识别边坡危险区和准确判断边坡稳定状态,提出了一种基于模糊综合评价法、MSARMA 法和 FLAC3D 的“面—点—面”边坡综合评价方法。首先根据现场边坡岩体的组成和结构特征,总结出滑坡成灾因子, 并根据滑坡体特征和采空区时空分布特征划分出离散型和连续型变量的赋值标准;然后,基于模糊数学综合评判原理,对多因素影响域内的高陡边帮稳定性进行综合评价,确定出不稳定区、较不稳定区、较稳定区和稳定区空间区划; 最后以不稳定区域的边坡潜在滑动面为计算模型,采用 MSARMA 方法进行边坡影响因子的敏感性分析,确定出敏感性因子,并用 FLAC3D 有限差分法进行数值模拟分析。以安太堡露天煤矿为例,划分了其不稳定区域,得出了在渗流和震动等敏感因子下的位移场演变规律。结果表明:天然工况下,边坡 X、Y 方向最大位移为 30 cm 和 41 cm;渗流工况下,西北帮边坡 X、Y 方向最大位移分别为 45 cm 和 70 cm;在地震作用下,北边帮和西边帮底部点的位移变化较小, 顶部点的位移较大。在上述分析的基础上,根据数值模拟分析结果提出了不稳定区域边坡加固及监测的设计方案, 确保了边坡的整体稳定性。所提出的边坡综合评价方法可为类似高陡岩质边坡稳定性分析提供参考。

关键词: 高陡岩质边坡, 稳定性评价, 模糊数学, 敏感性分析, MSARMA, FLAC3D

Abstract: In order to effectively identify the danger area of slope and accurately judge the stability state of slope,a set of " face-point-surface" slope comprehensive evaluation method based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, MSARMA method and FLAC3D was proposed. Firstly,according to the composition and structural characteristics of the on-site slope rock mass,disaster factors were summarized,while assignment criteria for discrete and continuous variables were divided based on the landslide body characteristics and spatiotemporal distribution. Following,based on the comprehensive evaluation principle of fuzzy mathematics,the high and steep side stability in the multi-factor influence regions was comprehensively evaluated,while the spatial division of the unstable region was determined. Finally,the slope potential slip surface in the unstable zone of the western side was utilized as the calculation model object,while the sensitivity analysis of the slope impact factor was conducted through the MSARMA method,and the sensitivity factors were determined. The FLAC3D finite difference method was utilized for numerical simulation analysis,and the conclusion was drawn. Taking Antaibao Open-pit Coal Mine as an example,its unstable area was divided and the evolution law of displacement field under sensitive factors such as seepage and vibration was obtained. The results showed that under natural conditions,the maximum displacements in X and Y directions of the slope are 30 cm and 41 cm,while under seepage conditions,the maximum displacements in X and Y directions of the northwest slope are 45cm and 70 cm,respectively. Under the action of earthquake,the displacements at the bottom of the north slope and the west slope change little,while the displacement at the top is larger. Based on the above results of numerical simulation,the design scheme of slope reinforcement and monitoring in unstable region was proposed to ensure the stability of the whole slope. The integrated evaluation method could provide reference for the stability analysis of similar high and steep rock slopes.

Key words: high and steep rock slope,stability evaluation,fuzzy mathematics,sensitivity analysis,MSARMA,FLAC3D

陶志刚, 刘珂源, 杨晓杰, 李静涛, 张鹏, 李赓照. 高陡岩质边坡“面—点—面”稳定性综合评价方法———以安太堡露天矿为例[J]. 金属矿山, 2023, 52(11): 241-252.

TAO Zhigang, LIU Keyuan, YANG Xiaojie, LI Jingtao, ZHANG Peng, LI Gengzhao. "Plane-Point-Plane" Stability Integrated Evaluation Method of High and Steep Rock Slope:A Case Study of Antaibao Open-pit Mine[J]. Metal Mine, 2023, 52(11): 241-252.

[1]	柴红, 郭俊超, 杨淑慧, 刘成博. 缓倾斜厚大矿体采场结构参数优化研究与应用[J]. 金属矿山, 2023, 52(11): 142-147.
[2]	顾明丽, 党钧陶. 考虑渗流作用的深部巷道围岩让压—锚注耦合控制规律研究[J]. 金属矿山, 2023, 52(11): 161-166.
[3]	满轲, 武立文, 刘晓丽, 宋志飞, 柳宗旭, 刘汭琳, 曹子祥. 基于灰色关联分析和 SSA-RF 模型的岩爆等级预测[J]. 金属矿山, 2023, 52(05): 202-212.
[4]	卢宏建, 武晓军, 武婕. 考虑接触面特性与采充时序的胶结充填体稳定性评价[J]. 金属矿山, 2023, 52(04): 1-7.
[5]	徐永文, 吴炳书, 李官兵, 李正灿, 刘允秋. 缓倾斜极薄矿体采场结构参数优化研究[J]. 金属矿山, 2022, 51(11): 52-57.
[6]	杨锋, 王亮, 郭庆彪, 万战胜. 渑栾高速采空区路段建设场地稳定性评价研究[J]. 金属矿山, 2022, 51(11): 198-207.
[7]	张卫中, 王维庆, 彭亚利, 康钦容, 张电吉. 基于AHP-FUZZY的瓦屋磷矿Ⅳ矿段房柱法出矿方式优选[J]. 金属矿山, 2022, 51(09): 18-24.
[8]	吴顺川, 刘兴雷, 韩龙强, 刘占全, 崔凤, 张西良, 贾文松. 降雨强度对第四系边坡稳定性影响机理分析[J]. 金属矿山, 2022, 51(08): 203-211.
[9]	王亮, 郭庆彪, 王磊, 吕鑫, 韩欣洋, 王启春. 采空区建设场地稳定性评价指标体系构建研究[J]. 金属矿山, 2022, 51(08): 245-253.
[10]	何理, 刘易和, 李琳娜, 陈江伟, 姚颖康, 刘昌邦. 基于粒子群—最小二乘支持向量机模型的矿山爆破振动速度预测[J]. 金属矿山, 2022, 51(07): 145-150.
[11]	杨意德, 杨天鸿, 刘洋, 邓文学, 李华, 田益琳, 叶会师. 司家营研山铁矿采场三维边坡稳定性数值模拟及协同监测分析[J]. 金属矿山, 2022, 51(04): 214-221.
[12]	郭义, 李昕昊, 王创业, 韩天宇, 游茹, 于波. 类岩石材料脆性特征与配合比方案试验研究[J]. 金属矿山, 2022, 51(02): 48-53.
[13]	蔡泳, 邓国梁, 甄利兵, 成墙, 黄金涌. 考虑矿柱流变效应的采空区力学模型分析[J]. 金属矿山, 2022, 51(02): 96-101.
[14]	杨向升, 郭广礼, 郭松, 郭宝德, 刘赞, 王跃宗. 基于改进模糊层次分析法的高压输电线路场地稳定性评价[J]. 金属矿山, 2022, 51(01): 231-236.
[15]	汪为平 , 王雨波, 刘海林, 李宁 , 刘帅, 李鸿飞. 基于灰关联法的超近距条件下石窟减震控制爆破敏感性分析[J]. 金属矿山, 2021, 50(12): 154-159.