欢迎访问《金属矿山》杂志官方网站,今天是 分享到:
×

扫码分享

金属矿山 ›› 2013, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (11): 106-109.

• 地质与测量 • 上一篇    下一篇

传统方法和地质统计学在矿产资源/储量分类中的对比分析

唐攀1,唐菊兴2,唐晓倩1,林彬1,方向1   

  1. 1.成都理工大学地球科学学院;2.中国地质科学院矿产资源研究所
  • 出版日期:2013-11-15 发布日期:2014-01-26
  • 基金资助:

    * 国家高技术研究发展计划(973计划)项目(编号:2011CB403103),中央公益性行业科研项目(编号:200911007-02,E0804),念青唐古拉地区成矿条件研究与找矿靶区优选项目(编号:1212010818089)。

The Comparative Research of Traditional Method and Geo-statistics Method in Mineral Resource/Reserve Classification

Tang Pan1,Tang Juxing2,Tang Xiaoqian1,Lin Bin1,Fang Xiang1   

  1. 1.College Of Earth Sciences,Chengdu University of Technology;2.Institute of Mineral Resources,Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences
  • Online:2013-11-15 Published:2014-01-26

摘要: 以Micromine软件为操作平台,总结传统方法和地质统计学方法的具体实现流程。通过2个典型矿床实例、2种方法的资源储量估算结果的对比分析,认为地质统计学法不仅考虑工程控制程度,而且还涉及克里格估计方差,并且能实现自动化,明显优于地质块段法、平行断面法为代表的传统方法,结果能直接应用于矿山开采方案。

关键词: 资源/储量分类, 地质统计学, 工程控制程度, 搜索椭球体

Abstract: Based on Micromine software,the paper summarizes the specific process of the traditional method and the geostatistical methodThrough comparative analysis on two typical deposits and reserves estimation results with two kinds of methods,it is considered that the geostatistical method is significantly superior to the traditional method with representative of the geological ore block method,the parallel section method,since it takes into account the level of engineering control,involves the kriging estimation variance,and also can realize the automationSo,tt can be directly applied in mining scheme.

Key words: Resource/Reserve classification, Geostatistics, Level of engineering control, Search ellipsoid