露井联采条件下采动边坡的变形机理研究

金属矿山 ›› 2009, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (11): 129-131.

露井联采条件下采动边坡的变形机理研究

彭洪阁，才庆祥，周伟，舒继森，陈彦龙

中国矿业大学

出版日期:2009-11-16 发布日期:2011-04-26
基金资助:
“十一五”国家科技支撑计划项目（编号：2006BAB16B00），中国矿业大学煤炭资源与安全开采国家重点实验室开放研究基金项目（编号：08KF08）。

Study on Distortion Mechanism of Mined Slope Affected by Open-pit and Underground Mining

Peng Hongge，Cai Qingxiang，Zhou Wei，Shu Jisen，Chen Yanlong

China University of Mining and Technology

Online:2009-11-16 Published:2011-04-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 通过对露井联采下采动边坡的分析，建立采动边坡梁模型，根据梁的受力及变形，得出梁变形产生拱的范围，即影响边坡范围；利用顶板破断后形成的沉陷范围，给出了采动边坡稳定系数计算方法，并得到最安全采深，结合安家岭露井联采的实践及边坡位移监测，得出902工作面采动下边坡稳定系数为1.38，最大安全采深为309 m。研究结果表明，露井联采条件下采动边坡变形是由于顶板变形引起的岩层倾角变化引起的，可为露井联采采动边坡稳定治理提供理论依据。

关键词: 露井联采, 采动边坡, 梁模型, 稳定性

Abstract: According to the analysis of the mined slope affected by open-pit and underground mining, the girder model of mined slope was built.Based on the stress and distortion of the girder, the range of arch was drawn out from distortion of girder, which is also called the affected slope range.By analyzing the sinking range formed from broken roof strata, the calculation of stabilization coefficient of mined slope and the most safety mining depth were obtained.Combining with the practice of open-pit and underground mining and the displacement survey of slope in Anjialing open pit, the slope stabilization coefficient was 1.38 and the most safety mining depth was 309 meters at the 902 working face.The research indicated that the distortion of mined slope under open-pit and underground mining was drawn from strata angle alter evoked from ceiling distortion, providing the theoretical foundation to keep the stability of mined slope under open-pit and underground mining.

Key words: Open-pit and underground mining, Mined slope, Girder model, Stability

彭洪阁, 才庆祥, 周伟, 舒继森, 陈彦龙. 露井联采条件下采动边坡的变形机理研究[J]. 金属矿山, 2009, 39(11): 129-131.

PENG Hong-Ge, CAI Qing-Xiang, ZHOU Wei, SHU Ji-Sen, CHEN Yan-Long. Study on Distortion Mechanism of Mined Slope Affected by Open-pit and Underground Mining[J]. Metal Mine, 2009, 39(11): 129-131.

[1]	肖益盖, 刘允秋, 汪为平, 王雨波, 夏才初, 徐晨, 吕志涛, 林梓梁. 某大型地下硐室群稳定性分析及加固技术研究[J]. 金属矿山, 2020, 49(09): 96-103.
[2]	石满生, 许威, 张美道, . 基于 Rhino-Griddle-Flac3D的矿体建模与地表稳定性分析[J]. 金属矿山, 2020, 49(08): 182-187.
[3]	赵兴东, 李怀宾, 张姝婧, 杨晓明, 张天航. 青龙沟金矿露天转地下采场稳定性分析及控制[J]. 金属矿山, 2020, 49(04): 10-14.
[4]	严雅静, 顾水杰, 于祥, 周昀, 赵康. 基于未确知测度理论的巷道围岩稳定性研究[J]. 金属矿山, 2019, 48(11): 20-26.
[5]	郭庆彪, 王亮, 吕鑫, 姜传礼. 基于云模型与模糊层次分析的老采空区建设场地稳定性评价[J]. 金属矿山, 2019, 48(11): 43-48.
[6]	侯征, 朱自强, 许小燕, 肖财, 吴顺川, 张力. 预应力锚索锚固力监测点经济高效布设方法研究[J]. 金属矿山, 2019, 48(11): 54-61.
[7]	邱胜光. 降雨入渗对非饱和土体边坡稳定性影响及治理对策[J]. 金属矿山, 2019, 48(11): 62-67.
[8]	朱伟. 采煤塌陷区土地建筑利用技术与工程应用[J]. 金属矿山, 2019, 48(11): 176-171.
[9]	郭庆彪, 李英明, 王亮, 吕鑫. 废弃采空区地基稳定性极简评价指标体系构建[J]. 金属矿山, 2019, 48(09): 179-184.
[10]	王卫东, 朱万成, 张鹏海, 王雷鸣. 基于微震参数的岩体稳定性评价方法及其在Spark平台的实现[J]. 金属矿山, 2019, 48(08): 147-156.
[11]	郝喆, 杨青潮, 周素航. 生态修复尾矿坝的边坡稳定性评价[J]. 金属矿山, 2019, 48(08): 162-166.
[12]	汪为平, 陆玉根, 段庆豹, 侯大德, 汪亮, 孙秀柱. 崩落法开采“悬留”大型采空区协同处置技术研究[J]. 金属矿山, 2019, 48(07): 8-13.
[13]	何标庆, 简文彬. 大型机械化作业下固体废物充填处理超大型采空区[J]. 金属矿山, 2019, 48(07): 19-25.
[14]	闫奇, 杨福波, 陈刚, 王晓军, 隋璨. 动静组合作用下大跨度凿岩硐室稳定性分析[J]. 金属矿山, 2019, 48(07): 41-48.
[15]	许梦国, 谭涛, 程爱平, 王平, 李丹峰, 杨洋. 程潮铁矿充填体下部崩落采场稳定性分析[J]. 金属矿山, 2019, 48(05): 14-20.